header-logo header-logo

The heat is on

24 November 2017 / Dr Timothy J Dodsworth , Christopher Bisping
Issue: 7771 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
nlj_7771_dodsworth

Could a cap on gas & electricity harm customers in the long run? Christopher Bisping & Dr Timothy J Dodsworth report

  • Government proposals to cap unit prices for gas and electricity will have a negative effect on competition.
  • Regulation of the roll-over process, at the end of a contract term, would fulfil the desired objectives without reducing competition.

Recently the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy published its Draft Domestic Gas and Electricity (Tariff Cap) Bill, outlining proposals to allow Ofgem, the regulator, to cap unit prices for gas and electricity which are supplied on the standard variable tariff (SVT). The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy suggests that the cap is designed to make the market ‘truly competitive’ and to protect vulnerable and low-income customers from expensive tariffs. However, the measures proposed are not only internally incoherent but—judging from our research into mobile phone contracts—will have the opposite effect to what the government hopes to achieve (The Pythagorean Regulation of Cell Phone Contracts—A study of automatically renewable long/term contracts across jurisdictions; forthcoming.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll