header-logo header-logo

24 November 2017 / Dr Timothy J Dodsworth , Christopher Bisping
Issue: 7771 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The heat is on

nlj_7771_dodsworth

Could a cap on gas & electricity harm customers in the long run? Christopher Bisping & Dr Timothy J Dodsworth report

  • Government proposals to cap unit prices for gas and electricity will have a negative effect on competition.
  • Regulation of the roll-over process, at the end of a contract term, would fulfil the desired objectives without reducing competition.

Recently the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy published its Draft Domestic Gas and Electricity (Tariff Cap) Bill, outlining proposals to allow Ofgem, the regulator, to cap unit prices for gas and electricity which are supplied on the standard variable tariff (SVT). The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy suggests that the cap is designed to make the market ‘truly competitive’ and to protect vulnerable and low-income customers from expensive tariffs. However, the measures proposed are not only internally incoherent but—judging from our research into mobile phone contracts—will have the opposite effect to what the government hopes to achieve (The Pythagorean Regulation of Cell Phone Contracts—A study of automatically renewable long/term contracts across jurisdictions; forthcoming.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll