header-logo header-logo

20 May 2016 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7699 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The heartache of Hillsborough

nlj_7699_robins

Jon Robins reports on the long struggle for justice of the victims & survivors of the 1989 tragedy

For all the coverage of the Hillsborough tragedy since last month’s inquest verdict, it is easy to overlook the horror of the day. Daniel Gordon’s two-hour documentary Hillsborough, shown on BBC2 earlier this month, was a harrowing and timely reminder of the scale and terror of what happened on 15th April 1989. Fans, families and the police spoke of the Lepping Lanes crush in horrific and unsparing detail. “It was like looking at fish in a trawler net,” one officer said.

Then there was the horror of a cover-up fully exposed in the inquest verdict of “unlawfully killing”. “The price of Hillsborough isn’t reducible to 96 people dying,” Professor Phil Scraton said. “The price of Hillsborough is the price of institutional injustice.”

That reflection came at the point in the film covering one of the lowest points of the Hillsborough campaign, the failed private prosecution of the match commander David Duckenfield and his deputy Bernard Murray in 2000. One of a number of occasions

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll