header-logo header-logo

04 February 2016
Issue: 7685 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Health & safety fine levels soar for UK plc

New sentencing guidelines represent “sea change” in health & safety law

Health and safety fines are soaring, with four UK companies incurring fines of more than £1m in the space of six days in January.

Fines of £4.8m were imposed between 21 and 26 January 2016. Meanwhile, tough new sentencing guidelines for health and safety and corporate manslaughter took effect on 1 February. Under the guidelines, large UK companies face unlimited fines with a starting point of £7.5m on organisations with a turnover of more than £50m, for corporate manslaughter. Smaller organisations with a turnover of up to £2m could face a fine of £450,000 or more.

Last month, C.RO Ports London Ltd was fined £1.8m following an incident where an employee caught his arm in a rotating machine. National Grid Gas plc was fined £1m after an engineer became trapped between two gas pipes. Balfour Beatty was fined £1m after a fatal crane incident. UK Power Networks (Operations) Ltd was fined £1m following the death of a runner who was electrocuted by a low-hanging high voltage power cable.

Gerard Forlin QC, of Cornerstone Barristers, who told NLJ in November that the new guidelines would “send a chill through corporate UK”, says: “Many parties may well have been trying to get cases to court before the guillotine date of 1 February 2016 heralding the new guidelines. The above listed fines appear to be a barometer or precursor of what is to come.

“Fine levels (and terms of imprisonment) are set to explode, and will inevitably lead to more trials. For those cases where guilty pleas will be entered, complicated preliminary hearings dealing with culpability bandings and turnover utilising experts will become the norm. Only time will tell, but how easily will courts be able to manage these additional, potentially lengthy hearings in already clogged up calendars? These guidelines represent a real challenge to everyone concerned.”

Danny McShee, partner at Kennedys, says: “The new sentencing guidelines represent a sea change in health and safety law. We anticipate that as the courts become familiar with the guidelines over the coming months, we will be increasingly advising corporate clients that they face a level of fine which, until very recently, would have been almost unfathomable.”

Issue: 7685 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll