header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

He, she, yo!

Roderick Ramage wonders whether lawyers should take the lead in promoting a new gender-neutral pronoun

Have the pupils at middle school and high school in Baltimore solved our linguistic dilemma? What does this sentence, in the rule book of a care home, mean?

“Where a complainant notifies the other residents of a complaint, they must lodge a section 12 notice within 14 days.”
 
You can tell that it was written by a sociologist or social worker because of the politically correct “they”. A journalist would be just as likely to have used “they” instead of thinking what he or she means to say, but is unlikely to have been commissioned to write a care home rule book. According to the New Scientist: “The lack of a gender neutral personal pronoun in English has bothered people for at least two centuries.” A strict grammarian, parsing that sentence, would have no difficulty in ascertaining what it says. The operative words are “they must lodge a…notice”, the word “they” is plural and, as the only other plural in the sentence is “the other residents”,
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll