header-logo header-logo

05 March 2010 / Shantanu Majumdar KC
Issue: 7407 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Limitation
printer mail-detail

To have & have not

Professional negligence litigation comes in fashions. One of the latest arises from the vogue for after the event (ATE) legal expenses insurance obtained, usually by claimants on conditional fee agreements, as protection against any eventual liability to pay the defendants’ costs.

Axa

In Axa Insurance Ltd (formerly Winterthur Swiss Insurance Co) v Akther & Darby Solicitors [2009] EWCA Civ 1166, [2010] PNLR 10, [2009] All ER (D) 151 (Nov) the claimant insurer was the assignee of ATE policies issued under a scheme operated by a claims management company whereby a panel of solicitors took on personal injury claims from members of the public. Conditions of acceptance under the scheme were that each claim had to have at least a 51% chance of success and a likely quantum of more than £1,000 (in order to take it outside the restrictive costs rules of the small claims régime) and on acceptance of a qualifying claim an ATE policy was issued.

The claimant made severe losses from its involvement in the scheme and claimed as to a number of such claims that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll