header-logo header-logo

02 March 2018 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7783 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Harsh repayment terms

nlj_7783_dobson

Nicholas Dobson examines the scenario of unlawful prison for council tax default

  • The regime for enforcement of non-payment of council tax was not systemically unfair and unlawful.

  • However, magistrates and authorities need to have careful regard to material statutory requirements.

Local authorities provide local governance, functions and services by statute. Many aim to be customer-friendly bodies in the manner of various private providers. However, there is a significant difference between local authority and private services. For with commercial firms, consumers can choose what and whether to buy and from whom. However, local authorities as monopoly providers of core functions, demand payment of council tax whether or not anyone liable for it uses or benefits from any of their services. Furthermore, failure to pay can result in statutory recovery options including (in the case of wilful refusal or culpable neglect) commitment to prison for up to three months.

Prison is of course a harsh recovery sanction and a January 2017 judicial review decision illustrated where magistrates’ courts and authorities can go wrong in imposing this measure without proper regard to relevant statutory requirements. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll