header-logo header-logo

Harmful viewing

01 February 2007 / Julian Samiloff
Issue: 7258 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Julian Samiloff discusses proposals to criminalise the possession of violent and extreme pornography online

The government proposes to strengthen laws against depictions of extreme sexual violence on the internet. Though already illegal to publish such material, it is legal to view. The initiative follows the tragic and horrific murder of Jane Longhurst and the public campaign based on the fact that her murderer was obsessed with images of sexual violence—the concern being that viewing such images causes extreme behaviour.

The publication offence

The Obscene Publications Acts 1959 (OPA 1959) and 1964 (OPA 1964) currently apply to internet content. However, under OPA 1959, s 1(3) an offence can only be committed by the publisher of the offending material eg image makers, website owners and hosting internet services providers (ISPs). OPA 1959, s 1(3) defines publication, for data stored electronically, as transmission of the material.

In R v Perrin [2002] EWCA Crim 747, [2002] All ER (D) 359 (Mar), applying R v Waddon, 6th April 2000, unreported, the defendant, a foreign national, was successfully prosecuted, on entering the UK, for uploading the offending material to a website in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll