header-logo header-logo

05 May 2020
Issue: 7885 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Hardship claims update

The Legal Aid Agency has amended its arrangements for hardship claims

As of 1 May, it will make advance payments for the minimum future payment on the claim as well as for work done on a Crown court case. The criteria are that the practitioner has spent at least one month on the case, is unlikely to be paid in the next three months, is likely to suffer financial hardship and is claiming for at least £450, not including VAT.

It will not be necessary to submit bank statements or other evidence, as there is a presumption of hardship in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Advance payments will be deducted from the final claim.

The Criminal Bar Association is advising its members to ‘keep logs for wasted preparation claims’.

Issue: 7885 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll