header-logo header-logo

09 April 2009 / Simon Young
Issue: 7364 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

A hard Act to follow?

Part one: Simon Young puts the Legal Services Act under the microscope

The last year has seen the creation of the various authorities required to operate the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007), and this, the first in a series exploring the effects of LSA 2007, concentrates on them. They are respectively:

      
      ●     The Legal Services Board (LSB)—the űber-regulator.

      
      ●     The Office for Legal Complaints (OLC)—to replace not only the Legal Complaints Service arm of the Law Society, but also the Legal Services Ombudsman and the Legal Services Complaints Commissioner.

      
      ●     The Consumer Panel—created by the LSB to represent both individual and business consumers.

      
      ●     The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)—given statutory independence by LSA 2007 and now a company limited by guarantee.

      
      ●     The professional bodies, eg the Law Society (the Society) operating either in a representative function or through their regulatory arms, eg the Solicitors Regulatory Authority (SRA).

One thing that these bodies have in common is the death of the concept that the legal profession had control over its own

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll