header-logo header-logo

04 October 2018 / Richard Harrison
Issue: 7811 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Hamilton for lawyers #3

Richard Harrison considers Hamilton’s written advocacy skills as exemplified in The Reynolds Pamphlet

Alexander Hamilton was a soldier, a politician and, notably, a lawyer. Articles in this series, inspired by Lin-Manuel Miranda’s eponymous hip-hop musical, have already touched on his negotiating skills (‘The Room Where It Happens’), his advocacy in the many essays he wrote as part of The Federalist Papers on behalf of his adopted client, the new US constitution (‘Hamilton for lawyers’, 167 NLJ 7761, p22), and the way in which his ‘Ten Duel Commandments’ can form the basis for a theory of litigation (‘Hamilton for lawyers #2’, NLJ 23 February 2018, p22).

However, his most notable piece of written advocacy, and one he deployed entirely in his own interests, is found in the work entitled Observations on certain documents contained in no. V & VI of “The History of the United States for the Year 1796,” in which the charge of speculation against Alexander Hamilton, late secretary of the Treasury, is fully refuted. Written by himself. Or, more briefly and famously, and providing the title for a song: The Reynolds

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll