header-logo header-logo

24 May 2018
Issue: 7794 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

Hale on privacy in the family court

The rules on when journalists can report from the family court and when they can’t ‘need to be simple, clear, coherent and accessible and they are not’, Lady Hale has said.

Giving the Sir Nicholas Wall Memorial Lecture on ‘Openness and privacy in family proceedings’, Lady Hale, President of the Supreme Court, called for more clarity on the subject of court reporting.

She questioned whether it was ‘right that the general rule is that civil courts sit in public unless…, while family courts sit in private unless…?’ Perhaps the Family Procedure Rules should be more specific about the principles governing the decision to sit in public, she said.

And while the point of publication of information is to raise public confidence, ‘can the public be confident if the judge is judge in what might be seen as his or her own cause?’

Issue: 7794 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll