header-logo header-logo

04 September 2019
Issue: 7854 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Guidance for judges on research

The Judicial Office has issued guidance for judges asked to take part in research into the judicial process or other aspects of court administration or procedure.

It advises that research applications will not normally be accepted from secondary school students, undergraduates, or those undertaking post-graduate masters and other taught courses. Nor would they normally be accepted from foreign research applications.

According to the guidance, the head of division or senior presiding judge approving participation must ensure that the research is in the public interest, and that taking part will not impair judicial discretion and independence, or draw judges into areas of political controversy. The research must also not place an undue burden on the judge, identify any judge, or require the judge to comment on the merits of individual cases.

 

Issue: 7854 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll