header-logo header-logo

29 June 2012
Issue: 7520 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Guarantees

Wuhan Guoyu Logistics Group Co Ltd and another company v Emporiki Bank of Greece SA [2012] EWHC 1715 (Comm), [2012] All ER (D) 142 (Jun)

The obligation of a guarantor was to be responsible for the contractual performance due by another person to a third. The commercial purpose of a guarantee was to ensure that the creditor was paid the debt owed to him by the debtor who was being guaranteed. English law afforded a guarantor under a guarantee of the classic type a considerable degree of legal protection. The essential characteristic of a guarantee was that the liability of the guarantor was a secondary one. It was the debtor who was primarily liable to pay. If therefore, the debtor had no liability, the guarantor had none either. The guarantor might avail himself of all the defences available to the debtor in respect of the payment sought. It was established practice to have payment guarantees that were not guarantees, properly so called, but instruments—often called demand bonds or performance bonds—by which a bank or similar institution promised to pay an instalment due against a written demand, or a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll