header-logo header-logo

11 March 2016 / Stephen Hurley
Issue: 7690 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

A growing issue

001_nlj_7690_hurley

Fat shaming & disability harassment. Stephen Hurley reports

If an employer allows “fat shaming” in the workplace, they may now be at risk of a claim of unlawful disability harassment.

In Bickerstaff v Butcher NIIT/92/14 (unreported) Neil Bickerstaff worked for Randox Laboratories Ltd in Northern Ireland. He had a body mass index (BMI) of 48.5 (a person with a BMI of 30 or over is classed by the World Health Organisation as being obese). On numerous occasions he suffered abusive comments by a number of work colleagues including being called a “fat bastard”.

Bickerstaff ultimately resigned. The Tribunal sitting in Belfast found that he had been a victim of unlawful harassment under the Disability Discrimination 1995 (the law in England & Wales now being contained in the Equality Act 2010).

In an important decision, albeit at first instance, the Tribunal concluded that he was disabled. A person has a disability if he has “a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and long term adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day to day activities”. In Bickerstaff’s case, he suffered from gout. On

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll