header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007 / Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Growing up fast

In the first of two articles marking 10 years of the Arbitration Act 1996, Khawar Qureshi QC discusses some key cases

A case search will show that there are almost 400 publicly available decisions to consider which involve the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996). There are in fact likely to be more court decisions, as some will be clothed with confidentiality where the parties have agreed for this and there is no overriding public interest to the contrary.

However, before jumping to the tempting conclusion that this indicates excessive scope for intervention by the English courts, one must bear in mind that not all these decisions will have involved challenges to the arbitral process. Some will have sought anti-suit injunctions to uphold a choice of arbitration or assistance for the arbitral process by some other means from the court.

Indeed, the clear message from all the key cases, most of which have been decided in the past couple of years, is that the choice of arbitration is being strongly supported by the English courts.

This article will focus upon four themes concerning

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll