header-logo header-logo

15 July 2022 / Colin Hayes
Issue: 7987 / Categories: Features , Profession , Collective action
printer mail-detail

Group actions: Time to join forces? (Pt 2)

87733
In the second of a special three-part series by Penningtons Manches Cooper, Colin Hayes considers developments on costs sharing in group actions
  • Apportionment of adverse common costs.
  • High Court declines to make an order regarding early apportionment.

With the growing popularity of group litigation, the courts are increasingly facing complex questions in regard to the apportionment of costs, both within and between claimant groups, and the extent to which the court ought to make an early determination in regard to how any costs liability is to be apportioned between such claimants.

These issues were recently considered by Mrs Justice Moulder in the cases of Upham & Ors v HSBC and Akinluyi & Ors v HSBC [2022] EWHC 227 (Comm). These cases involve two separate sets of proceedings against HSBC, one by various claimants represented by Edwin Coe (the Edwin Coe claimants) and the other by Stewarts (the Stewarts claimants). It was agreed that these cases be case-managed and heard together as there are common issues between them (albeit there are some differences between the causes of action).

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll