header-logo header-logo

28 July 2011 / Ian McDougall
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Great expectations?

Ian McDougall ponders the future of the legal profession

It is fascinating to ponder how the law will develop over coming years. My own retrospective anthology Cases That Changed Our Lives (LexisNexis, 2010) tried to examine the impact of legal changes on the lives of people. But something that often gets overlooked, and therefore has to play “catch-up” as the law moves on, is how the profession of law will change to meet the needs of a changing world? I believe it is a mistake to imagine the law developing without any impact either on, or from, the actual practice of law.

Past developments

The modern law office has been transformed. In the distant past, people employed “scribes” to copy important documents, when the ability to write was a skill in itself. Research was a process of reviewing a mountain of paper; books, periodicals and statutes. An important part of the legal advisor’s skill was the ability to retrieve the relevant area of law. Printing took the place of the scribe and eventually technological wonders such as the telex machine and word processor

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll