header-logo header-logo

26 October 2017
Issue: 7767 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-detail

Graduated fee U-turn

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has backed down on proposed cutbacks to graduated fees. In February, its consultation, ‘Litigators’ Graduated Fees Scheme and Court Appointees’ proposed reducing the number of prosecution pages used to calculate the graduated fee from 10,000 to 6,000 and limiting costs payable to court appointees to legal aid rates, in Crown Court cases.

Almost all of 1,005 responses opposed the proposals. A MoJ spokesperson said this week: ‘The Lord Chancellor has confirmed he will not reinstate the second fee cut for all defence litigation work that was suspended in April 2016. At the same time, we are making changes to ensure payments better reflect the actual work being done in legal aid-funded criminal proceedings.’

Issue: 7767 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll