header-logo header-logo

Government wrong to criminalise young people

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

News

Government plans to increase jail terms for young offenders after a  spate of teen shootings have been criticised by youth justice experts.

Home Office lawyers are currently looking into strengthening gun laws, and are working in conjunction with the London Mayor’s Office on how to tackle the issue. Prime Minister Tony Blair is due to host a gun crime summit this week. The Prime Minister told the BBC last week that the lower age limit for a mandatory five-year prison sentence for carrying a gun should be reduced from 21 to 17, and that being a member of a gang should be an aggravating factor in sentencing.

However, former Youth Justice Board (YJB) chair Rod Morgan, who resigned from his post last month, spoke out against increasing jail sentences for young people. Writing in The Guardian this week he says criminalising children and young people is “criminogenic”.

“Cluttering up courts with minor offenders deflects the system from devoting more attention to persistent, serious offenders whose risk of reoffending is high,” he says. “We should be spending more on early preventive work with children at risk and their parents. In recent years, the YJB has had no option but to spend seven times as much on custody as on early prevention schemes, the cost benefits of which are proven.”
 

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll