header-logo header-logo

15 May 2008
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Government presses ahead with overhaul of immigration rules

News

The government has published its proposals for employing skilled and temporary migrant workers in the latest phase of its overhaul of the immigration system. The schemes—known as Tier 2 and Tier 5 of the new pointsbased system—follow a lengthy review of the UK’s immigration rules and the introduction of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 this year. Natalie Black, a lawyer at Thring Townsend Lee & Pembertons, says Tier 2 aims to amalgamate some of the many ways that skilled workers can enter and work in the UK, including the work permit scheme. She says: “Prospective workers under this tier will have to earn a certain number of points based on their skills, standard of English and prospective salary. The threshold of points required will change depending on the requirements of businesses and the country.” UK employer companies will have to be licensed by the Border and Immigration Agency to “sponsor” Tier 2 applicant migrants they wish to employ, having first proven they cannot fill the skilled posts with resident workers. Skilled migrant workers will have to  produce a certificate of sponsorship and a job offer before they can even apply for a visa. Tier 5 is intended to cater for youth mobility and those travelling to the UK for primarily non-economic reasons such as voluntary work, sport and entertainment. Tier 5 migrants will need a licensed sponsor and a certificate of sponsorship showing they have the requisite number of points and have sufficient funds to maintain themselves in the UK. The Tier 5 scheme is intended to ensure that the number of young workers entering the country under this tier mirrors the number of UK nationals benefiting from reciprocal arrangements overseas. She says: “Many of our clients are reliant on immigration to fill vacancies within their workforce and will be concerned by the changes that have taken place. On the face of it, the new licensing system could be unduly bureau cratic and the shifting points system too unpredictable for employers to make long-term plans in respect of their staffing needs.” It is not yet known if the pointsbased system is flexible enough to balance the requirements of UK employers with the government’s desire to control the flow of foreign workers into the country, according to Black. She adds: “In the meantime, it is vitally important that employers comply with their obligations as licensed employers to avoid incurring the substantial fines and criminal sanctions that may be imposed.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll