header-logo header-logo

24 November 2021
Issue: 7958 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Goodbye to SIF?

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has launched a consultation on its proposals to close the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF) and end its post six year run off cover

SIF provided compulsory professional indemnity cover for solicitors from 1987 to 2000, when the profession switched to an open market model of insurance. It is a requirement that all policies include provision for at least six years run-off cover if the firm closes without a successor practice. About 90% of run-off claims are made within six years, and the most common type of claim faced by a solicitor is professional negligence, which has a six-year limitation period.

SIF, which has funds of about £22m, also provides run-off cover to firms once their six-year run-off period finishes, which is known as post six-year run-off cover (PSYROC). This provides continuity of protection for the client as well as peace of mind for retired solicitors.

The SRA predicts about 45 claims in 2023, lessening to 31 in 2029. It acknowledges the risk of delayed retirement where solicitors are concerned about long-tail claims and the increased risk of disorderly closure and ‘poor outcomes for consumers’, in annex 3 of the consultation.

However, Anna Bradley, Chair of the SRA Board, said: ‘Our analysis, in the light of detailed evidence, shows that establishing or maintaining a regulatory scheme to deliver ongoing post six-year run-off cover is unlikely to be proportionate in light of the level of consumer protection it provides.’

Calling for SIF to be retained, Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘The average successful claim is over £34,000, which is a large amount of money for most people.

‘The consumers who will suffer will employ solicitors on a reasonable assumption that they would have comprehensive protection if something went wrong. The SRA is suggesting that this comprehensive protection is removed, but it is yet to demonstrate that the removal of PSYROC will have any material impact on the cost of legal services or lead to any improvement in the market for legal services.’

The consultation ends on 15 February 2022, and can be viewed here.

Issue: 7958 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll