header-logo header-logo

28 January 2016 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

For the good of the profession

nlj_7684_bindman

A levy on high-earning lawyers: 20 years on & Geoffrey Bindman QC is still waiting

Twenty years ago I failed to persuade my colleagues on the Law Society’s pro bono working party to recommend a levy on high-earning lawyers to supplement public funding. The working party did however accept a compromise: it urged the Society to establish a voluntary fund. When the proposal was put to the big City firms, they turned it down. The Law Society dropped it. The Labour Party later supported a compulsory levy but also dropped it on entering government in 1997.

Jon Robins’s article on the funding crisis reminded me of this history (see “Breaking point”, 165 NLJ 7679, p 7). I do not know if Michael Gove was aware of it when he was appointed as lord chancellor and secretary of state for justice but I am pleased that he has revived the idea of a levy. Soon after he took office he floated it in a lecture which, when reported, again produced a hostile response from the City. I wrote an article

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll