header-logo header-logo

12 April 2013 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7555 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

The good fight

istock_000000103375medium

The loss of legal aid is a major cause for concern, says Jon Robins
 

Amid the fervent Jackson mania, it can feel as though the impact of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) on the already beleaguered civil legal aid scheme gets overlooked. It remains poor cousin to the wealthy (relatively speaking) claimant PI lobby or, for that matter, the criminal Bar which has friends in high places and has always proved a powerful advocate in its own cause.

It is worth remembering that if one idea underpins the sprawling LASPO monster it is the political imperative to remove £350m from the £2.2bn legal aid scheme. It does this by axing entire areas of law except where they remain protected by the requirements of the European convention on human rights. So—one more time for those that for those that haven’t been paying attention—LASPO means no more legal aid for pretty much all social welfare law and that means welfare benefits, employment, debt, immigration, plus most housing except where there is homelessness.

Government figures

On the government’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll