header-logo header-logo

19 February 2009 / David Catchpole
Issue: 7357 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Wills & Probate , Other practice areas
printer mail-detail

The Golden Rule

If your client’s mental capacity is in doubt, how do you best advise them? David Catchpole explains

There is a good degree of knowledge in the legal profession about the so called golden but tactless rule where the capacity of a testator may be in issue. However, while the vast majority of probate practitioners are aware of the rule, fewer appear to follow it in practice. Telling your client, who you may have represented for numerous years, that you have concerns about their mental faculties is never easy—and many solicitors will shy away from this very difficult conversation. It is a conversation that may well lose a client (and potential fee income) as a result. Further, some practitioners may feel it is better to prepare a will and risk a fight in future over capacity, than to refuse to prepare a will and risk a possible professional negligence claim for not following their client’s instructions. Will preparation is a competitive business and a solicitor refusing to prepare a will for a  client whose capacity he questions knows  that the client could

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll