header-logo header-logo

10 April 2008 / Francesca Richmond
Issue: 7316 / Categories: Features , Public , Procedure & practice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Going stateside

When can individuals be extradited for pre-2003 cartel offences? Francesca Richmond reports

The recent judgment of the House of Lords in Norris v Government of the United States of America and others [2008] UKHL 16, [2008] All ER (D) 158 (Mar) has made clear that individuals can be extradited to the US for involvement in price-fixing activities that occurred prior to June 2003 and the implementation of the statutory criminal cartel offence under s 188 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (EnA 2002). Extradition on this basis will only be granted where some aggravating feature, such as dishonesty, is also alleged against the individual because agreements to fix prices have not historically been treated as dishonest in themselves (and so entering into such an agreement and/or failing to declare participation in a cartel alone cannot be treated as an indictable criminal offence prior to 2003).

 

EXTRADITION ACT

The Extradition Act 2003 requires that the offending conduct cited by any state requesting extradition must be criminal in and and also the state requesting extradition at the time that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll