header-logo header-logo

01 November 2013 / Mr Justice Foskett
Issue: 7582 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

The going rate

165800417

Foskett J sets the record straight over the survey into guideline hourly rates

A survey of law firms gets underway today (1 November) to help set new guideline hourly rates (or GHR) for solicitors, legal executives and other fee-earners. Here, Mr Justice Foskett, who chairs the committee responsible for that work, answers some pertinent questions.

 

Why do we need GHRs?

The guideline hourly rates were originally developed to help judges making summary assessments of costs in civil litigation and thus deciding what solicitors and other legal fee earners should be paid by the losing side for their work on a case. However, they have a wider influence than that and are a common reference point for practitioners, clients and the judiciary. They are set formally by the Master of the Rolls.

Why are new GHRs required?

They were last updated in 2010 and the underlying evidence for the 2010 rates was itself out-dated. Successive Masters of the Rolls did not want to increase the rates based simply on inflation. They have wanted any change to be based on a clear evidence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll