header-logo header-logo

29 April 2010 / Charlotte Ovans , Tony Lewis
Issue: 7415 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Going global

Tony Lewis & Charlotte Ovans consider the Bribery Act 2010 & a global approach to anti-corruption

Companies need to pay attention to the Bribery Act 2010 (the Act). The Act is particularly notable as it creates a new strict liability corporate criminal offence of failing to prevent bribery. There is a real danger that under the new legislation a company could unwittingly commit the corporate criminal offence as a result of someone on the ground in another country, over whom it has little control, making an irregular payment.

Recent developments

The Act received Royal Assent earlier this month. The main provisions of the Act are expected to come into force later in the year. The Act replaces antiquated law which was complex, and, until recently, rarely enforced.

The new legislation is significant in a number of respects, not least because it includes a new corporate criminal offence of failing to prevent bribery, wherever the bribery takes place in the world.
In broad terms there are four types of offence in the Act which are:
(i) A general offence targeting the payer of a bribe.
(ii) A

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll