header-logo header-logo

22 October 2009 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Going up a gear

Will a stricter regime for experts mark the end of forum shopping & increase the level of professionalism? Mark Solon reports

New rules introduced this month require all expert witnesses in civil courts to state they are aware of the legal rules that relate to them. Many experts are unaware of the changes, however, if they do not follow the new regime, their evidence may not be acceptable in court.

Experts have always needed to know their subject area and their duty to the court, but the recent changes to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) have gone a step further. From 1 October, experts will have to include in their reports a statement confirming their awareness of all relevant court rules.

This key change was introduced to address the view that many experts have failed to comply with the existing rules. Solicitors will now need to look for evidence that an expert has an understanding of CPR Pt 35 (Practice Direction and Protocol). It is also likely that if cases go to court, experts could be cross-examined about their knowledge.

Declaration

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll