header-logo header-logo

06 February 2015 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7639 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A glimmer of light?

francis

Andrew Francis discusses right of light reform proposals

In June 2011 the Law Commission (LC) published a Report and draft Bill (Making Land Work: easements covenants and profits à prendre) (Law Com. No.327) which proposed radical reform of the law in that area. In that report the LC stated that it would undertake a separate project on rights of light in its 11th Programme of reform. This was done and the LC published a consultation paper in February 2013; Law Com. No. 210.

Significantly the report and draft Bill published on 4 December 2014 reflects the decision of the Supreme Court on 26 February 2014 in Lawrence v Fen Tigers [2014] AC 822, [2014] 2 All ER 622.

The key concerns that lie behind consultation paper and the report and Bill which sparked the need for reform may be summarised as follows:

  1. The effect of the decision in HKRUK II (CHC) Ltd v Heaney [2010] EWHC 2245, [2010] All ER (D) 101 (Sep). This increased the risk of an injunction being awarded for actionable infringement of a right of light,
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll