header-logo header-logo

18 May 2018 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7793 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Giving notice: why delivery matters

nlj_7793_pigott_0

Can a notice period start even when the employee has not read their dismissal letter? Charles Pigott investigates

  • The Supreme Court has decided that a contractual notice period did not start to run until the employee had read the dismissal letter.
  • It declined to imply a term that notice should run from the date the letter arrived in the post.

In Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v Haywood [2018] SC 22, [2018] All ER (D) 110 (Apr) the Supreme Court has finally settled the question of how to calculate the date from which a written notice of dismissal starts to run, in the absence of an express term in the contract of employment.

Why the date of dismissal mattered

Ms Haywood worked for an NHS Trust. Her post was in the process of being made redundant and she was approaching her 50th birthday. She was entitled to 12 weeks’ notice and there was no express term in her contract of employment stipulating how notices were to be given.

By the time the Trust was ready to serve her redundancy notice,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll