header-logo header-logo

06 February 2019
Issue: 7827 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Give maternity claims more time, Bar says

The Bar Council has called for a ‘more liberal regime’ for pregnancy or maternity leave discrimination claims.

Responding to the Law Commission’s Employment Law Hearing Structures consultation, the Bar Council said maternity and pregnancy-related claims differed from other areas of employment law because ‘an individual may be facing particular difficulties at this point in their life and the commencing of litigation may seem like one battle too many when they are juggling so many issues.

‘With a longer time limit, the individual would be able to focus on the merits of their claim rather than have to balance the decision to make a claim against their wellbeing.’

The consultation, which closed on 31 January, looked at the jurisdictions of the Employment Tribunal, Employment Appeal Tribunal and the civil courts.

Issue: 7827 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Discrimination
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll