header-logo header-logo

30 June 2023 / Sophie Houghton
Issue: 8031 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Getting ready for fixed costs

128476
Sophie Houghton rounds up some key points for practitioners to consider ahead of the extension of fixed recoverable costs
  • The extension of fixed recoverable costs, applying to cases issued on or after 1 October 2023, is aimed at making the costs regime fairer and more transparent.
  • There are a number of issues practitioners should consider ahead of the changes, including the potential for costs shortfalls, the possibility of satellite litigation and the impact on Part 36 offers.

The extension of fixed recoverable costs (FRC) will apply to most civil cases valued up to £100,000 that are issued on or after 1 October 2023. For personal injury cases, the new FRC regime will apply where the cause of action accrues on or after 1 October 2023, and for disease claims it will apply where the letter of claim has not been sent to the defendant before 1 October 2023.

The extension of FRC is aimed at making the costs regime fairer and more transparent. It is also targeted at making the litigation process more efficient and ensuring certainty and predictability

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll