header-logo header-logo

01 October 2012 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7531 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Getting in line

Chris Pamplin considers revised guidance for expert witnesses & those who instruct them

In 2005 the Civil Justice Council (CJC) published guidance on instructing experts to give evidence in civil claims, and this is now annexed to Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Practice Direction (PD) 35.

Although the guidance was updated in 2009, there have been no significant changes since its inception.

However, in July 2012, a CJC working party published revised guidance for the instruction of experts (see http://www.jspubs.com/Experts/library/lib_eridx.cfm).

It is designed, say its authors, to help litigants, instructing solicitors and expert witnesses to understand best practice in meeting the requirements of the CPR.

The CJC expects that this revised version will replace the Experts’ Protocol currently appended to PD35. However, before it comes into force, it needs to be reviewed and approved by the Civil Procedure Rules Committee - such matters are seldom swiftly done.

Although the substance of the guidance is not radically different from the 2005 version, there are some subtle changes and one or two quite significant ones. One clear difference is how the guidance has been structured.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll