header-logo header-logo

10 November 2017 / Nathan Webb
Issue: 7769 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Getting consumer rights right

nlj_7769_webb

Cancellation periods & enforceability. Nathan Webb discusses potential pitfalls for traders

  • Traders and their advisers should ensure that contracts entered into with consumers incorporate the right to cancel.
  • If the right to cancel is not notified, the customer will have a claim for breach of contract and it is possible that the trader may not be able to enforce the contract or claim in restitution for any work done or monies advanced under it.

A key innovation in consumer law in recent years has been the introduction of mandatory cancellation periods in consumer contracts. The current statutory provisions requiring notification of cancellation periods to consumers are detailed in the Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/3134) (the 2013 Regs), which implement the Consumer Rights Directive 2011. Unlike preceding regulations made in 1987 and 2008, the 2013 Regs are silent on the issue of enforceability of a consumer contract where information on cancellation periods is not provided.

This article will explore unenforceability in English law and specifically how it has been employed in consumer law and could potentially be applied

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll