header-logo header-logo

04 December 2018 / Adrian Jack
Issue: 7820 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Getting by on the bench

Adrian Jack takes a critical look at the recent SSRB report on judicial salaries 

  • Examines the recent Senior Salaries Review Body report on judicial salaries.
  • Looks at proposed pay rises, structure and impact on particular posts.

On 12 October 2018 The Sun newspaper quoted ‘a source close to’ David Gauke, the Lord Chancellor, with the soundbite: ‘We are sympathetic to judges and are not saying we will not support a pay rise for them. But it is likely to be closer to 2% than 32%.’

This was in response to the leaked Senior Salaries Review Body’s (SSRB) report on the judicial salary structure. When the report was formally published on 26 October, the Lord Chancellor issued a press release saying: ‘Judges will be granted their biggest pay rise in ten years with an annual increase of 2%.’

The press release did not mention: (a) the consumer price index had risen 2.7% in 2017; (b) this was the tenth year of below inflation awards; and (c) the SSRB had recommended an increase of 2.5%. The Lord Chancellor’s spinmeister seems also to have overlooked

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll