header-logo header-logo

04 December 2018 / Adrian Jack
Issue: 7820 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Getting by on the bench

Adrian Jack takes a critical look at the recent SSRB report on judicial salaries 

  • Examines the recent Senior Salaries Review Body report on judicial salaries.
  • Looks at proposed pay rises, structure and impact on particular posts.

On 12 October 2018 The Sun newspaper quoted ‘a source close to’ David Gauke, the Lord Chancellor, with the soundbite: ‘We are sympathetic to judges and are not saying we will not support a pay rise for them. But it is likely to be closer to 2% than 32%.’

This was in response to the leaked Senior Salaries Review Body’s (SSRB) report on the judicial salary structure. When the report was formally published on 26 October, the Lord Chancellor issued a press release saying: ‘Judges will be granted their biggest pay rise in ten years with an annual increase of 2%.’

The press release did not mention: (a) the consumer price index had risen 2.7% in 2017; (b) this was the tenth year of below inflation awards; and (c) the SSRB had recommended an increase of 2.5%. The Lord Chancellor’s spinmeister seems also to have overlooked

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll