header-logo header-logo

09 January 2020 / Claire Christopholus
Issue: 7869 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Getting away with murder?

13682
Irrelevant details about a victim’s sexual history are not a defence to murder or assault, says Claire Christopholus

The recent press coverage of British backpacker Grace Millane’s murder trial has served as a shocking reminder of the prejudicial treatment of young women, and the unwillingness of the media and the public to distinguish between consensual ‘rough sex’ and sexual violence. Grace (whose parents are pictured above) was 21 years old, travelling alone in New Zealand, when she was strangled to death on a first date. Her killer, whose name is subject to a court ‘suppression’ order, subsequently photographed her naked, before bundling her body into a suitcase and burying her in a forest. His defence was that they had engaged in rough sex, including choking, and Grace (pictured below) had died accidentally.

‘Friends of Grace Millane give evidence about her BDSM [bondage, domination and sadomasochism] interests’; ‘She asked him to choke her during sex’; ‘Grace Millane used a safe word whilst practising BDSM’; ‘Strangled tourist liked being choked’. These are just some of the sensationalised, clickbait headlines, which contribute towards a wider

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll