header-logo header-logo

25 January 2018
Issue: 7778 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Gauke refuses Worboys ban

nlj_7778_news_1

The Lord Chancellor has come under fire over the John Worboys issue for the second time since his appointment.

David Gauke refused to give his support this week to a call to ban Worboys, the taxi driver rapist who is due for release, from the Greater London area where some of his victims live.

Gauke told MPs that the ‘most stringent’ licensing conditions will be placed on the convicted rapist, but that ‘when it comes to the precise conditions those are operational matters that are decided at an operational level’.

Last week, Gauke was criticised for indicating that he was considering a judicial review of the Parole Board’s decision to release Worboys, before backtracking on the basis it would ‘not be appropriate’ for him to proceed. Meanwhile, the charity Centre for Women’s Justice is set to launch a judicial review this week. Harriet Wistrich, Birnberg Peirce partner, who is acting for the victims, said Gauke’s decision did not weaken their case because the Parole Board was the Ministry of Justice’s creation ‘and he cannot therefore challenge his own rules’.

Wistrich sent a letter before claim on the Centre’s behalf last week threatening judicial review on the basis that a blanket policy preventing publication of the Parole Board’s reasons is unlawful in a case where there is overriding public interest and widespread concern among the public; and the decision to release Worboys in light of all the known facts ‘appears to be wholly irrational’.

Gauke (pictured with entourage) was sworn in to his new role only last week.

Issue: 7778 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll