header-logo header-logo

11 April 2014 / Siobhan Jones
Issue: 7602 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Game over

web_jones_0

Administrators of insolvent tenants are under a duty to pay rent owed to landlords, says Siobhan Jones

On 24 February 2014, the Court of Appeal delivered their unanimous judgment in the long awaited appeal in Pillar Denton Ltd and Ors v Jervis & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 180 (Game). The decision has clarified the obligations on the part of administrators of insolvent tenants to pay rent to a landlord where tenant companies go into administration.

Insolvent corporate tenants

These issues have been taxing landlords and administrators alike. The principles as to how rent falls to be treated in these circumstances were considered extensively, and settled, in the cases of Goldacre (Offices) Ltd v Nortel Networks UK Ltd [2010] Ch 455 (Goldacre) and Leisure Norwich (II) and others v Luminar Lava Ignite Ltd (in administration) and others [2012] EWHC 951 (Ch) (Luminar).

In short, an administrator was not liable to pay rent (in advance) which fell due prior to the date of administration, even if the administrator subsequently occupied the premises for the purposes of the administration during

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll