header-logo header-logo

05 March 2014
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

GAME decision reassures landlords

Lewison: existing law left in "very unsatisfactory state"

Commercial rent is payable when a company falls into administration, the Court of Appeal has held.

Ruling in Pillar Denton v Jervis [2014] EWCA Civ 180, Lord Justice Lewison described the existing law as having been left in a “very unsatisfactory state” by previous High Court rulings. He said rent should be treated as accruing from day to day, and was payable as an expense of the winding up or administration.

The case, brought by a consortium of landlords, concerned a dispute over £3m in back rent due prior to the collapse of digital game retailer GAME.

Previously, if a company entered administration the day after the quarterly rent payment was due, the rent for that quarter could legally go unpaid, with the landlords being only an unsecured creditor and paid a percentage of assets realised during the administration. This effectively gave the administrators a three-month grace period, in which they could trade while seeking a buyer.

Paul Booth, head of commercial litigation at Baxter Caulfield, says: “The appeal court ruling means rent will now be classed as an expense of an administration, which is paid ahead of creditors, and administrators must pay rent for any time that they occupy a property.”

He says the ruling will stop “tactical administrations”. 

Ian Fletcher, director of policy at the British Property Federation, says: “This is the fairest outcome for all, as it means that landlords get paid and that insolvency practitioners can trade over the best timeframe for the rescue of the business.”

Issue: 7597 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll