header-logo header-logo

11 October 2007 / Sam Skinner
Issue: 7292 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Gambling at the Bar

A waste of time and money? Sam Skinner believes the BVC is inadequate and in need of urgent reform

If the Bar is to continue to maintain its high standards, it must train the best potential advocates, regardless of socio-economic background. As we await the final conclusions of Lord Neuberger’s Entry to the Bar Working Party (expected by the end of this year) about how the Bar should rear its young, I would like to make an argument for fundamentally reforming the Bar vocational course (BVC) as the best way to bring about fairer entry to the profession.

From my position on the lowest rung of the ladder, I believe that the most pressing concern for someone who wants to become a barrister is whether or not it will be a waste of time and money to take the BVC.

Those from all but the most affluent backgrounds are forced to gamble an enormous sum, at long odds, on a career at the Bar. My argument is that the Bar is not offering students value for money from the vocational year, but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll