header-logo header-logo

22 January 2016 / James Ward
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Future-proofing

nlj_7683_ward

2016 is the year of the client review, says James Ward

Over the last year, private client practitioners have been awash with new laws which in some way will affect the succession planning of their clients. In 2015 alone, we had the proposed residential nil rate band, introduction of capital gains tax for non-residents, proposed changes to the domicile rules, introduction of the EU succession regulations and the proposed changes to stamp duty for second homes that has a direct impact on trust ownership. On top of this, the case of Ilott v Mitson [2015] EWCA Civ 797, [2015] All ER (D) 290 (Jul), arguably setting new precedents around the concept of “reasonable financial provision”, was relayed to the public at large.

Now comes the enviable task of digesting the implications of the various changes. With this in mind, 2016 will no doubt be the year of client review and re-assessment of their affairs. This will be particularly focused on the following:

Residential nil rate band

The introduction of this extension to the nil rate band in 2017 will be welcome for clients with assets under £2.35m,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll