header-logo header-logo

29 October 2009 / James Naylor
Issue: 7391 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Future proof

While seeing into the future is not yet expected of property lawyers, advising as to future risk is, says James Naylor

In Stoll, Darren Atkins, Brambleridge Management Limited v Wacks Caller (a firm) [2009] EWHC 2299 (Ch) Cs instructed D, a now defunct firm of Manchester solicitors, to purchase development property, for the sum of £400,000.

The purchase contract was conditional upon Cs obtaining planning permission for the conversion of the property into two flats, with a further dwelling at the rear.

Completion was due to take place on the 21st day following the date of planning permission; save that if the planning application was refused, or if the sale and purchase was not completed within six months of exchange, the sale agreement was to lapse.

Contracts were exchanged following the grant of planning permission by Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (the council) on 30 July 2003, and completion took place on 19 August 2003.

However, the proposed development never proceeded because, post-completion, on 9 September 2003, out-of-the-blue, Cs new neighbours applied for judicial review of the council’s decision to grant planning permission. This resulted in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll