header-logo header-logo

20 May 2014 / Dominic Regan
Categories: Opinion , Jackson
printer mail-detail

The future of costs

Attempting to quantify the worth of lawyers poses a dilemma, say Dominic Regan

Costs reform is far from over. One might think that after the welter of changes last year litigators would be left to recuperate. Not so. 

The next body blow is likely in the imminent review of guideline hourly rates. Given the ravenous appetite to cut costs in every quarter how likely is it that any increase in rates will be suggested? On the contrary, my sense is that cuts are coming. 

In a fix

Lord Justice Jackson has recently expressed both orally and in print his fervent wish for fixed costs to be imposed upon all fast-track litigation. To date, we only have this in injury cases which occurred recently. There are vast swathes of cases worth up to £25,000 where costs remain at large. The Jackson motivation is two-fold. Fixed costs, one can safely presume, would be pitched at less than the current going rate. Also, giddy doubts about what costs are proportionate under the new April 2013 test would be avoided as the scale figure would be the last

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll