header-logo header-logo

08 May 2024
Issue: 8070 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Fury after duty solicitor pinned down by security guards

Criminal lawyers have threatened to boycott Stratford Magistrates’ Court after court security guards pinned a duty solicitor to the floor

The duty solicitor, Dele Johnson, had been working in the youth court on 1 May, when the incident occurred. London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA) has called for the court security guards involved to be suspended pending investigation.

In an open letter to HM Courts and Tribunal Services (HMCTS), Edward Jones, LCCSA president, noted the solicitor was injured and ‘police officers present in the building were called upon to intervene’.

Jones said: ‘Based on the reports we have received, we are seriously concerned and appalled at the alleged behaviour of the security officers involved.

‘Given the seriousness of the alleged incident and the already documented history of complaints against security staff at Stratford Magistrates’ Court (which are already the subject of an official complaint by this association), we have no confidence at the moment that those tasked with ensuring the safety of our members and colleagues at this court are capable of doing so. We therefore demand the immediate suspension from duty of all the security officers involved in the incident pending a full, independent investigation into the facts.

‘Should these security officers continue to work at this court, we may recommend to our members that they do not attend Stratford Magistrates’ Court until this situation has been resolved.’

LCCSA recently made an official complaint about ‘invasive searches’ of solicitors at the same court. In an open letter to HMCTS in April, it said it had been receiving ‘extremely concerning’ reports of ‘over-zealous’ searches, including a pat-down search of a female duty solicitor who, after referring to one of the guards as an ‘idiot’ during the search, was forcibly ejected, had her lunch thrown on the pavement and was denied re-entry.

A spokesperson for HMCTS said: ‘These are serious complaints and we are urgently investigating them as a matter of priority. It would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage. Our security measures are designed to protect the safety of all court users within our premises and remain under constant review.’

Issue: 8070 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll