header-logo header-logo

14 May 2009 / Steven Friel , Michael Williams
Issue: 7369 / Categories: Features , Public , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Funding manoeuvres

How, if at all, has the downturn in the economy affected litigation funding? Steven Friel & Michael Williams discuss the evidence

* * * * * *

There has been a great deal of hyperbole written about litigation funding in the last year. An expected increase in litigation caused by the financial crisis combined with the increasingly accepting political and judicial approach to litigation funding has led many to predict a rapid rise in third party funding agreements, including agreements whereby professionals funders such as banks and hedge funds agree to take on a part of the litigation risk from a claimant in return for a slice of the damages award if the case is successful. However, for all the hype, a relatively small number of cases have actually been funded, suggesting that demand in the current economic climate may be not be as ripe for litigation funding as many expected.

Conditional fee agreements

The usual type of conditional fee agreement (CFA) between a client and his solicitor provides that if the client loses the case he will not be liable to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll