header-logo header-logo

22 July 2026
Issue: 8171 / Categories: Legal News , Collective action , Litigation funding , Competition
printer mail-detail

Funding for opt-out claims under consultation

Damages-based agreements (DBAs), also known as contingency fees, could be allowed for opt-out collective actions in the Competition Appeal Tribunal

The government consultation, ‘Swifter and simpler competition redress, regulatory appeals and competition enforcement’, launched last week and due to close on 25 September, aims to make opt-out collective actions faster and easier. It builds on responses to a call for evidence last autumn.

The government noted feedback that the current reliance on litigation funders makes the regime ‘vulnerable’, particularly in light of the PACCAR litigation, which created ambiguity about the enforceability of litigation funding agreements. It stated: ‘An increase in options for funding claims could increase competition and therefore drive down the cost of litigation finance, mitigating the risk of a justice gap and increasing the resilience of the regime.’

Other proposals include costs sanctions for unreasonable behaviour and delivery of the funder’s return at an earlier stage in the proceedings. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Aggressive sales tactics can add up to fraudulent trading even without proof of a particular deception or financial loss
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll