header-logo header-logo

25 January 2018
Issue: 7778 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Fundamental dishonesty first

A defendant who is ‘fundamentally dishonest’ about a part of his insurance claim forfeits his entire claim, the High Court has held. The decision, in Sinfield v London Organising Committee for the Olympics (in Liquidation) [2018] EWHC 51 (QB), is bad news for those who exaggerate when making an otherwise legitimate claim.

The claimant was injured while volunteering at the 2012 Olympics. His claim included false statements about hiring a gardener and false invoices. Liability was admitted in full.

On appeal, Mr Justice Knowles clarified that ‘fundamental dishonesty’ under s 57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 occurs where the claimant has ‘substantially affected the presentation of his case’.

Where it occurs, Knowles J said the entire claim should be dismissed, including any genuine element of it, unless the claimant would suffer substantial injustice.

Roger Jones and Martin Stockdale, partners at Kennedys, which acted for the defendant, said the judgment ‘will now become the leading authority’ and clearly shows s 57 has ‘real bite’.

Issue: 7778 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll