header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Freshfields faces age discrimination claim

News

A former Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer partner is suing the City law firm for age discrimination over pension cuts in one of the first cases of its kind since new rules were introduced in October last year.

Peter Bloxham, 54, the City giant’s former head of insolvency, filed the claim at a London employment tribunal. He was one of about 30 lawyers who chose to retire from Freshfields’ partnership on a full pension last year, instead of staying on and falling victim to swingeing cuts in retirement benefits.

From last May, partners were to receive a maximum of £153,000 a year in retirement—as much as 40% les than under Freshfields’ previous plan. About one-third of partners eligible for early retirement decided to leave when the changes were announced.

Ronnie Fox, principal of FOX, says retirement of partners has become a minefield for law firms.
“Firms can no longer require partners to retire against their wish simply on the grounds of age unless this can be justified objectively. This is a real area of uncertainty and law firms have difficult choices to make,” he adds.

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll