header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Legal News , Freedom of Information , Other practice areas
printer mail-detail

Freedom of information extension limited

Housing associations, independent schools and other charities are to be excluded from the extension of the freedom of information regime.

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) had been expected to add these organisations to the list of public authorities covered directly by the Freedom of Information Act 2000, following a consultation a year ago.

However, it announced this month that they would be excluded, on the basis the burden imposed on them would outweigh the benefits. Tom Morrison, associate at Rollits, says: “There has been a growing feeling among public authorities—and some MPs—that the public’s right of access to information is becoming increasingly inconvenient. Entire administrative structures have had to be put in place solely to deal with information requests since the Act came into force in 2005.”

According to the MoJ, 21% of “resolvable” requests for information under the FOIA were withheld in 2008, compared with 18% in 2005 when the Act came into force.
 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll