header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 July 2013
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Freedom of information—Exempt information—Attorney general's certificate

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

R (on the application of Evans) v Attorney General [2013] EWHC 1960 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 111 (Jul)

Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court, Lord Judge LCJ, Davis LJ and Globe J, 9 July 2013

The attorney general's power to issue a certificate under s 53 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA 2000), with the practical effect of preventing disclosure ordered by the Upper Tribunal is not unconstitutional; reasons have to be provided and will be available to scrutiny on judicial review. The certificate issued precluding disclosure of letters of the Prince of Wales was not unreasonable and thus would not be overturned.

Dinah Rose QC & Aidan Eardley (instructed by Guardian News and Media Ltd) for the claimant. Jonathan Swift QC & Julian Milford (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Attorney General. Timothy Pitt-Payne QC (instructed by the Information Commissioner's Office) for the Information Commissioner.

The claimant was a journalist. In April 2005, he sought disclosure of communications passing between the Prince of Wales and various government departments from September

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS
Read All
Legal notice: Notice under the Trustee Act 1925

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Emergency lawyers on call as international regulatory actions soar
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
NLJ this week: Employment law’s fine margins
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll