header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 July 2013
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Freedom of information—Exempt information—Attorney general's certificate

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

R (on the application of Evans) v Attorney General [2013] EWHC 1960 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 111 (Jul)

Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court, Lord Judge LCJ, Davis LJ and Globe J, 9 July 2013

The attorney general's power to issue a certificate under s 53 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA 2000), with the practical effect of preventing disclosure ordered by the Upper Tribunal is not unconstitutional; reasons have to be provided and will be available to scrutiny on judicial review. The certificate issued precluding disclosure of letters of the Prince of Wales was not unreasonable and thus would not be overturned.

Dinah Rose QC & Aidan Eardley (instructed by Guardian News and Media Ltd) for the claimant. Jonathan Swift QC & Julian Milford (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Attorney General. Timothy Pitt-Payne QC (instructed by the Information Commissioner's Office) for the Information Commissioner.

The claimant was a journalist. In April 2005, he sought disclosure of communications passing between the Prince of Wales and various government departments from September

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll